On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 10:54:58PM +0100, Jó Ágila Bitsch wrote: > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:01 PM Andy Shevchenko > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:31:36PM +0100, Jó Ágila Bitsch wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ... > > > I compiled and tested your patch in my test setup and it works perfectly. > > > > Thanks for the testing. According to Submitting Patches documentation > > you can provide a formal Tested-by tag. > > Thanks for pointing this out to me. > > I'm not really sure how to do that though. > On https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight, > it says: > > Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending next versions. > > So I guess you could do that at your convenience on any next version. In mine I can only do if you give me that tag. Till this line the tag is not given, but... > Or is it already ok, if I just add the following line in my comment? ...this is what is expected to have. > Tested-By: Jó Ágila Bitsch <jgilab@xxxxxxxxx> And now _if_ I need a new version I will bear this with it. Otherwise maintainer, who picks up the patch, takes care of gathering these all together. > I'm still quite a newbie in the kernel development community, so > thanks for bearing with my ignorance :-) So far you are doing good, thanks! -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
