On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 9:01 PM Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 06:31:36PM +0100, Jó Ágila Bitsch wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 25, 2023 at 3:34 PM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > We have two types for UUIDs depending on the byte ordering. > > > Instead of explaining how bytes should go over the wire, > > > use dedicated APIs and data types. This removes a confusion > > > over the byte ordering. > > > > Thanks for pointing this out. I was unaware of the exact UUID > > functions, as I'm still quite a newbie here. > > > > I compiled and tested your patch in my test setup and it works perfectly. > > Thanks for the testing. According to Submitting Patches documentation > you can provide a formal Tested-by tag. Thanks for pointing this out to me. I'm not really sure how to do that though. On https://docs.kernel.org/process/submitting-patches.html#reviewer-s-statement-of-oversight, it says: > Both Tested-by and Reviewed-by tags, once received on mailing list from tester or reviewer, should be added by author to the applicable patches when sending next versions. So I guess you could do that at your convenience on any next version. Or is it already ok, if I just add the following line in my comment? Tested-By: Jó Ágila Bitsch <jgilab@xxxxxxxxx> I'm still quite a newbie in the kernel development community, so thanks for bearing with my ignorance :-) Best regards and thanks a lot, Jó > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > >
