2009/10/29 Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Why were these patches resent? What changed? > > Everybody who is going to review these patches has already reviewed > them and now they need to review them all again? I resent the patches because the iommu-helper change was not correct and I introduced serious bug in bitmap_find_next_zero_area() if align_mask != 0 in follow-up patch then those were dropped from the -mm tree. Only [PATCH 1/7] and [PATCH 2/7] have changes since the first submission of this patch set. * [PATCH 1/7] - Rewrite bitmap_set() and bitmap_clear() - Let bitmap_find_next_zero_area() check the last bit of the limit - Add kerneldoc for bitmap_find_next_zero_area() * [PATCH 2/7] - Convert find_next_zero_area() to use bitmap_find_next_zero_area() correctly iommu-helper doesn't want to search the last bit of the limist in bitmap * [PATCH 3/7] - [PATCH 7/7] - No changes -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
