On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 21:31:43 -0800 Jakub Kicinski <kuba@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Hi, > On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 13:32:28 +0000 Andre Przywara wrote: > > The Microsoft Devkit 2023 is a an ARM64 based machine featuring a > > Realtek 8153 USB3.0-to-GBit Ethernet adapter. As in their other > > machines, Microsoft uses a custom USB device ID. > > > > Add the respective ID values to the driver. This makes Ethernet work on > > the MS Devkit device. The chip has been visually confirmed to be a > > RTL8153. > > Hm, we have a patch in net-next which reformats the entries: > ec51fbd1b8a2bca2948dede99c14ec63dc57ff6b > > Would you like this ID to be also added in stable? We could just > apply it to net, and deal with the conflict locally. But if you > don't care about older kernels then better if you rebase. Stable would be nice, but only to v6.1. I think I don't care about older kernels. So what about if I resend this one here, based on top of the reformat patch, with a: Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 6.1.x line in there, and then reply to the email that the automatic backport failed, with a tailored patch for v6.1? Alternatively I can send an explicit stable backport email once this one is merged. Cheers, Andre