Cool. Then I think, I can go ahead with BeagleBoard. Thanks, guys, for your help. - Mayuresh On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:38 PM, Jon Elson <jmelson@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Mayuresh Kasture wrote: >> >> Thank you, guys, for replying. >> >> I am currently looking at BeagleBoard. I am new to embedded systems. >> Hence, not able to quite understand the kernel development >> limitations, if any, on this board. I am kind of swinging between >> pages explaining BeagleBoard, the Angstrom Linux distribution and >> openembedded for this information. >> >> Can you tell me what layer in the USB hierarchy is the lowest layer I >> can modify? So, if I want to play with packet formation, error >> handling, urbs etc., can I do that in Angstrom distribution? >> > > You can build directly on Angstrom, but most people cross-compile on a PC or > other > system. Angstrom is a "light weight" kernel, ie. smaller code size, etc. > But, you can also > run Debian or other "normal" kernels on the Beagle, and it is as full a > Linux system as > anything you can put on a PC. > Jon > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
