On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 12:07:38PM +0100, Jon Hunter wrote: > > On 28/10/2022 10:25, Jon Hunter wrote: > > > > On 28/10/2022 03:19, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 25/10/2022 04:02, Wayne Chang wrote: > > > > > > > > > > + power-domain-names: > > > > > > + items: > > > > > > + - const: xusb_host > > > > > > + - const: xusb_ss > > > > > > > > > > Drop 'xusb_'. > > > > > > > > The properties are constant and we use the name to get the power domain. > > > > > > > > tegra->genpd_dev_host = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, > > > > "xusb_host"); > > > > > > > > tegra->genpd_dev_ss = dev_pm_domain_attach_by_name(dev, "xusb_ss"); > > > > > > > > we might not be able to drop the xusb_ > > > > > > These are new bindings, so why do say they are "constant"? New bindings > > > means you did not use them. If you used them before bindings... what can > > > we say? Don't? > > > > Not exactly. However, what we should do here is convert the legacy > > binding doc [0] and replace with this one. But yes we are stuck with the > > 'xusb_host' naming. > > > Thierry already has a patch to do this [0]. So we should fix that up and > included in this series. > > Jon > > [0] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-tegra/20211209165339.614498-3-thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxx/ I have a v2 with at least some of the comments addressed. I'll go through them again and send it out. If we can get that reviewed, it can be included in this series and the Tegra234 addition be applied on top. Thierry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
