On Sun, Aug 14, 2022 at 05:33:09AM -0700, Frank Mori Hess wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2022 at 8:08 AM Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Then please work with your vendor as only they can provide the needed > > support that you are already paying for. Take advantage of that, > > nothing we can do about odd vendor kernels, sorry. > > I'm not looking for support, I've already fixed the bug for myself. > I'm just trying to provide some useful information to the dwc2 > maintainer in case they care about fixing the bug. The bug is > obviously still present in the current mainline kernel. From the > dwc2_hc_nyet_intr function, they #ifdef out incrementing the > error_count (as I tried to explain earlier, even incrementing the > error_count is not enough, there needs to be a hard error): > > #if 0 > /* > * Todo: Fix system performance so this can > * be treated as an error. Right now complete > * splits cannot be scheduled precisely enough > * due to other system activity, so this error > * occurs regularly in Slave mode. > */ > qtd->error_count++; > #endif If you have a fix, please, send it as a normal patch submission so we can review and accept it like normal. No need to do anything else here out-of-the-ordinary. thanks, greg k-h