On Sat, Oct 03, 2009 at 05:33:24PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > Of course -- the "with low latency set" part fell out (or, was implicit
> > ;-) ). Your patch, however, still has low_latency set when it calls
> > tty_flip_buffer_push and that's the problem.
>
> I don't think it does - I removed all the low latency setting.
It's still in the patch you posted (and ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY is left
unmodifed, that is set, by your patch):
@@ -1700,9 +1697,6 @@ static int ftdi_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port)
spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->tx_lock, flags);
priv->tx_bytes = 0;
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->tx_lock, flags);
- spin_lock_irqsave(&priv->rx_lock, flags);
- priv->rx_bytes = 0;
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->rx_lock, flags);
if (tty)
tty->low_latency = (priv->flags & ASYNC_LOW_LATENCY) ? 1 : 0;
@@ -1730,7 +1724,6 @@ static int ftdi_open(struct tty_struct *tty, struct usb_serial_port *port)
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&priv->rx_lock, flags);
/* Start reading from the device */
- priv->rx_processed = 0;
usb_fill_bulk_urb(port->read_urb, dev,
usb_rcvbulkpipe(dev, port->bulk_in_endpointAddress),
port->read_urb->transfer_buffer,
But nevermind, we agree it should go. :-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
