On 21/06/2022 16:41, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:16:49PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: >> >> >> On 21/06/2022 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: >>>> Hey Bin, Greg, >>>> Short series here adding support for USB on Microchip PolarFire SoC FPGAs. >>>> The kconfig dependency for INVENTRA_DMA has become a bit of a mouthful, >>>> is there a better way of dealing with that? >>>> Thanks, >>>> Conor. >>>> >>>> Changes since v1: >>>> - Drop unneeded resource copying as per Rob's changes to the other drivers >>>> - Drop the dts patch >>>> >>>> Conor Dooley (2): >>>> usb: musb: Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller >>>> MAINTAINERS: add musb to PolarFire SoC entry >>>> >>>> MAINTAINERS | 1 + >>>> drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig | 13 +- >>>> drivers/usb/musb/Makefile | 1 + >>>> drivers/usb/musb/mpfs.c | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >>>> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >>>> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/musb/mpfs.c >>>> >>>> >>>> base-commit: f2906aa863381afb0015a9eb7fefad885d4e5a56 >>>> -- >>>> 2.36.1 >>>> >>> >>> Any chance you can get your company to fix up their email settings: >>> >>> Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20220613114642.1615292-1-conor.dooley%40microchip.com/t.mbox.gz >>> Analyzing 4 messages in the thread >>> Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... >>> --- >>> ✗ [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: musb: Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller >>> ✗ [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add musb to PolarFire SoC entry >>> --- >>> ✗ BADSIG: DKIM/microchip.com >>> --- >>> Total patches: 2 >>> >>> If I didn't know better, I would think you were spoofing the address... >> >> Great, thanks. I was honestly hoping you would make this complaint. >> I brought it up with our IT before & nothing has happened yet. > > It's amazing that your company emails are even making it to many systems > these days with that broken. Well DKIM is actually enabled for the domain - just it is simple/simple which I would imagine passes in direct emails? > >> At least now I have the direct complaint to forward :) > > Please do, and tell them that in the future, some of us will probably > start requiring this to pass as I doubt they want just anyone to spoof > patches from your domain :) I said as much to them already, hopefully the complaint helps. Thanks again, Conor.
