On Tue, Jun 21, 2022 at 03:16:49PM +0000, Conor.Dooley@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > > > On 21/06/2022 15:36, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 12:46:41PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote: > >> Hey Bin, Greg, > >> Short series here adding support for USB on Microchip PolarFire SoC FPGAs. > >> The kconfig dependency for INVENTRA_DMA has become a bit of a mouthful, > >> is there a better way of dealing with that? > >> Thanks, > >> Conor. > >> > >> Changes since v1: > >> - Drop unneeded resource copying as per Rob's changes to the other drivers > >> - Drop the dts patch > >> > >> Conor Dooley (2): > >> usb: musb: Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller > >> MAINTAINERS: add musb to PolarFire SoC entry > >> > >> MAINTAINERS | 1 + > >> drivers/usb/musb/Kconfig | 13 +- > >> drivers/usb/musb/Makefile | 1 + > >> drivers/usb/musb/mpfs.c | 265 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 4 files changed, 279 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > >> create mode 100644 drivers/usb/musb/mpfs.c > >> > >> > >> base-commit: f2906aa863381afb0015a9eb7fefad885d4e5a56 > >> -- > >> 2.36.1 > >> > > > > Any chance you can get your company to fix up their email settings: > > > > Grabbing thread from lore.kernel.org/all/20220613114642.1615292-1-conor.dooley%40microchip.com/t.mbox.gz > > Analyzing 4 messages in the thread > > Checking attestation on all messages, may take a moment... > > --- > > ✗ [PATCH v2 1/2] usb: musb: Add support for PolarFire SoC's musb controller > > ✗ [PATCH v2 2/2] MAINTAINERS: add musb to PolarFire SoC entry > > --- > > ✗ BADSIG: DKIM/microchip.com > > --- > > Total patches: 2 > > > > If I didn't know better, I would think you were spoofing the address... > > Great, thanks. I was honestly hoping you would make this complaint. > I brought it up with our IT before & nothing has happened yet. It's amazing that your company emails are even making it to many systems these days with that broken. > At least now I have the direct complaint to forward :) Please do, and tell them that in the future, some of us will probably start requiring this to pass as I doubt they want just anyone to spoof patches from your domain :) thanks, greg k-h
