On 26.04.22 04:27, Peter Hutterer wrote: > > chiming in here: the hidraw ioctl is independent (as already mentioned) > but it's basically the same approach and/or intent. The hidraw revoke ioctl is > "the evdev revoke, but for hidraw", this one is "the evdev revoke, but for > usb". Not very creative, but at least we can point to prior art and say "this > seems to be useful" :) > > The primary focus of all this are joystick devices (unless I missed some other > grand plans Bastien had that I'm not aware of), that should put things in > context a bit. > Hi, taking the advantages as a given, I must still ask, why this, if it is so useful, should be implemented for each subsystem separately. I cannot help but say that this should go into the VFS. Regards Oliver
