On 07-04-22, 12:21, Jules Maselbas wrote: > Update the syntax used by the documentation of phy operation functions. > This is to unify the syntax with the newly added documentation. Is there any reason for using this sytax, is it documented somewhere..? How does this syntax help? > > Signed-off-by: Jules Maselbas <jmaselbas@xxxxxxxxx> > --- > v2: new patch > v3: no change > > drivers/phy/phy-core.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c > index d1817a0f2d09..d11b517e283a 100644 > --- a/drivers/phy/phy-core.c > +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-core.c > @@ -467,7 +467,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_reset); > * runtime, which are otherwise lost after host controller reset and cannot > * be applied in phy_init() or phy_power_on(). > * > - * Returns: 0 if successful, an negative error code otherwise > + * Return: %0 if successful, a negative error code otherwise > */ > int phy_calibrate(struct phy *phy) > { > @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_calibrate); > * on the phy. The configuration will be applied on the current phy > * mode, that can be changed using phy_set_mode(). > * > - * Returns: 0 if successful, an negative error code otherwise > + * Return: %0 if successful, a negative error code otherwise > */ > int phy_configure(struct phy *phy, union phy_configure_opts *opts) > { > @@ -527,7 +527,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(phy_configure); > * PHY, so calling it as many times as deemed fit will have no side > * effect. > * > - * Returns: 0 if successful, an negative error code otherwise > + * Return: %0 if successful, a negative error code otherwise > */ > int phy_validate(struct phy *phy, enum phy_mode mode, int submode, > union phy_configure_opts *opts) > -- > 2.17.1 > > > -- > linux-phy mailing list > linux-phy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy -- ~Vinod