On Fri, 4 Sep 2009, [utf-8] Michał Nazarewicz wrote:
Well. I though that using FSG prefix in storage_common as well as
mass_storage will be awkward. That's why I decided to use "stor"
for storage_common (ie. thinks common for both FSG and MSF that is
/storage/ gadget/function), "fsg" for file_storage and "msf" for
f_mass_storage.
On Fri, 04 Sep 2009 16:14:06 +0200, Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Using "stor" is awkward too. It doesn't distinguish between
gadget-side and host-side; there are functions in the usb-storage
driver that use "usb_stor_" as a prefix.
IMO you might as well use "fsg" for everything, even though it isn't
entirely appropriate for a file-backed storage _function_. Things like
this happen for historical reasons all the time.
I'll use fsg through all of the code then.
--
Best regards, _ _
.o. | Liege of Serenely Enlightened Majesty of o' \,=./ `o
..o | Computer Science, Michał "mina86" Nazarewicz (o o)
ooo +-<m.nazarewicz@xxxxxxxxxxx>-<mina86@xxxxxxxxxx>-ooO--(_)--Ooo--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
