On Thursday 27 August 2009, George Spelvin wrote: > You're allowed to call gs_buf_put with a zero count, and it's not a common > case that deserves optimizing. Acked-by: David Brownell <dbrownell@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/usb/gadget/u_serial.c | 3 +-- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/usb/gadget/u_serial.c b/drivers/usb/gadget/u_serial.c > index 86e9ffc..427f9b6 100644 > --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/u_serial.c > +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/u_serial.c > @@ -881,8 +881,7 @@ static int gs_write(struct tty_struct *tty, const unsigned char *buf, int count) > port->port_num, tty, count); > > spin_lock_irqsave(&port->port_lock, flags); > - if (count) > - count = gs_buf_put(&port->port_write_buf, buf, count); > + count = gs_buf_put(&port->port_write_buf, buf, count); > /* treat count == 0 as flush_chars() */ > if (port->port_usb) > status = gs_start_tx(port); > -- > 1.6.3.3 > > -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
