On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 3:24 PM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 01:32:48PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > A version of this patch has already been applied to net-next. > > > > > > That was apparently net (not net-next). > > > > > > > No idea which version that was or why the second patch hasn't been > > > > applied yet. > > > > It seems because I only sent the 1/2 patch in the v3. Also due to > > this, gregkh asked me to resend the whole patchset again. > > Yeah, it's hard to keep track of submissions sometimes, especially if > not updating the whole series. > > > > > Dongliang, if you're resending something here it should first be rebased > > > > on linux-next (net-next). > > > > > > And the resend of v3 of both patches has now also been applied to > > > net-next. > > > > > > Hopefully there are no conflicts between v2 and v3 but we'll see soon. > > > > You mean you apply a v2 patch into one tree? This thread already > > contains the v3 patch, and there is no v2 patch in the mailing list > > due to one incomplete email subject. > > > > BTW, v2->v3 only some label change due to naming style. > > Ok, I can't keep track of this either. I just noticed that this patch > shows up in both net (for 5.14): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net.git/commit/?id=a6ecfb39ba9d7316057cea823b196b734f6b18ca > > and net-next (for 5.15): > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/netdev/net-next.git/commit/?id=788e67f18d797abbd48a96143511261f4f3b4f21 > > The net one was applied on the 15th and the net-next one yesterday. I did not get any notification about this merge operation. So I cannot help with this. Any chance to notify the developers the patch is merged? In some subsystems, I will get notified by robots. In the future, I will keep in mind updating the whole patch set. This is easier for developers to follow. > > Judging from a quick look it appears to be the same diff so no damage > done. That's great. > > Johan
