On Thu, Jul 22, 2021 at 12:42 AM Johan Hovold <johan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:34:56PM +0200, Johan Hovold wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 04:17:01PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote: > > > On Wed, Jul 21, 2021 at 3:36 PM Greg Kroah-Hartman > > > <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 14, 2021 at 05:13:22PM +0800, Dongliang Mu wrote: > > > > > The current error handling code of hso_create_net_device is > > > > > hso_free_net_device, no matter which errors lead to. For example, > > > > > WARNING in hso_free_net_device [1]. > > > > > > > > > > Fix this by refactoring the error handling code of > > > > > hso_create_net_device by handling different errors by different code. > > > > > > > > > > [1] https://syzkaller.appspot.com/bug?id=66eff8d49af1b28370ad342787413e35bbe76efe > > > > > > > > > > Reported-by: syzbot+44d53c7255bb1aea22d2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > > Fixes: 5fcfb6d0bfcd ("hso: fix bailout in error case of probe") > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dongliang Mu <mudongliangabcd@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > --- > > > > > v1->v2: change labels according to the comment of Dan Carpenter > > > > > v2->v3: change the style of error handling labels > > > > > drivers/net/usb/hso.c | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------- > > > > > 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Please resend the whole series, not just one patch of the series. > > > > Otherwise it makes it impossible to determine what patch from what > > > > series should be applied in what order. > > > > > > > > > > Done. Please review the resend v3 patches. > > > > > > > All of these are now dropped from my queue, please fix up and resend. > > > > A version of this patch has already been applied to net-next. > > That was apparently net (not net-next). > > > No idea which version that was or why the second patch hasn't been > > applied yet. It seems because I only sent the 1/2 patch in the v3. Also due to this, gregkh asked me to resend the whole patchset again. > > > > Dongliang, if you're resending something here it should first be rebased > > on linux-next (net-next). > > And the resend of v3 of both patches has now also been applied to > net-next. > > Hopefully there are no conflicts between v2 and v3 but we'll see soon. You mean you apply a v2 patch into one tree? This thread already contains the v3 patch, and there is no v2 patch in the mailing list due to one incomplete email subject. BTW, v2->v3 only some label change due to naming style. > > Johan
