On Mon 17 May 04:09 CDT 2021, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:48:33PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > Some of the boilerplate code was copy pasted from the typec_switch and
> > retained the use of the switch's container_of macros. The two structs
> > are identical in this regard, so this change doesn't cause a functional
> > change today, but could possibly cause future issues.
> >
> > Fixes: 3370db35193b ("usb: typec: Registering real device entries for the muxes")
> > Signed-off-by: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/usb/typec/mux.c | 6 +++---
> > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > index 8514bec7e1b8..e4467c4c3742 100644
> > --- a/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > +++ b/drivers/usb/typec/mux.c
> > @@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ static void *typec_switch_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *id,
> > dev = class_find_device(&typec_mux_class, NULL, fwnode,
> > switch_fwnode_match);
> >
> > - return dev ? to_typec_switch(dev) : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> > + return dev ? to_typec_mux(dev) : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>
> That does not look correct to me?
>
No it doesn't, you're right. I spotted the last one and it being trivial
I obviously didn't pay enough attention when just "fixing" the other two
instances of "the same".
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -87,7 +87,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(typec_switch_put);
> >
> > static void typec_switch_release(struct device *dev)
> > {
> > - kfree(to_typec_switch(dev));
> > + kfree(to_typec_mux(dev));
>
> Ditto.
>
> > }
> >
> > static const struct device_type typec_switch_dev_type = {
> > @@ -239,7 +239,7 @@ static void *typec_mux_match(struct fwnode_handle *fwnode, const char *id,
> > dev = class_find_device(&typec_mux_class, NULL, fwnode,
> > mux_fwnode_match);
> >
> > - return dev ? to_typec_switch(dev) : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
> > + return dev ? to_typec_mux(dev) : ERR_PTR(-EPROBE_DEFER);
>
> That looks correct.
>
> Either I'm missing something, or only the last change is needed.
>
Sorry about that, I'll fix it up and repost the patch.
Regards,
Bjorn
