Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] usb: gadget: f_uac2/u_audio: add feedback endpoint support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri 30 Apr 2021 at 16:55, Pavel Hofman <pavel.hofman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Dne 30. 04. 21 v 16:26 Jerome Brunet napsal(a):
>> From: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@xxxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> As per USB and UAC2 specs, asynchronous audio sink endpoint
>> requires explicit synchronization mechanism (Isochronous
>> Feedback Endpoint)
>> 
>> Implement feedback companion endpoint for ISO OUT endpoint
>> 
>> This patch adds all required infrastructure and USB requests
>> handling for feedback endpoint. Syncrhonization itself is
>> still dummy (feedback ep always reports 'nomimal frequency'
>>  e.g. no adjustement is needed). This satisfies hosts that
>> require feedback endpoint (like Win10) and poll it periodically
>> 
>> Actual synchronization mechanism should be implemented
>> separately
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Ruslan Bilovol <ruslan.bilovol@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> Hi,
>
> The HS calculation of Q16.16 feedback value
> overflows at some 524kHz, disallowing use of larger samplerates (e.g.
> 768kHz or higher).
>
> I tested the formula used in alsa USB driver
> https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/d99676af540c2dc829999928fb81c58c80a1dce4/sound/usb/endpoint.c#L80
> which uses only 10bit shift. The feedback control in UAC2 gadget now
> works up to 4M samplerate with 1Hz precision (tested on RPi4 with
> bInterval = 1, checked in stream0 proc file on linux host).
>
> --- a/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c
> +++ b/drivers/usb/gadget/function/u_audio.c
> @@ -118,7 +119,8 @@ static void u_audio_set_fback_frequency(enum
> usb_device_speed speed,
>                  * Prevent integer overflow by calculating in Q12.13
> format and
>                  * then shifting to Q16.16
>                  */
> -               ff = DIV_ROUND_UP((freq << 13), (8*1000)) << 3;
> +               ff = ((freq << 10) + 62) / 125;

Pavel, The code posted is a little different from snip here.
While I understand the "<< 10" and "/ 125", the "+ 62" would welcome a
comment.

Also in the final patch, the calculation is a bit different and moved to
"long long" ... but I'm sure the same type of improvement could be done.

>         }
>         *(__le32 *)buf = cpu_to_le32(ff);
>  }
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Pavel.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux