> From: Jia-Ju Bai, On 2021/3/10 10:54, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > >> From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 10:39 PM > >> On 2021/3/9 19:59, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > >>>> From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 6:01 PM > >>>> > >>>> When __usbhsf_pkt_get() returns NULL to pkt, no error return code of > >>>> usbhsf_pkt_handler() is assigned. > >>> Yes. Also I realized that no error return code of usbhsf_pkt_handler() > >>> was assigned if the type value was unexpected value. So, I'm thinking > >>> initial value of ret should be -EINVAL instead of 0. > >> This is okay to me. > >> Need I write a new patch for this? > > Thank you for your reply. I can write such a new patch with your > > Reported-by for this as minor refactoring of the usbhsf_pkt_handler(). > > May I write such a patch? > > Okay, sure :) I got it :) Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda
