Hi Jia-Ju, > From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Tuesday, March 9, 2021 10:39 PM > On 2021/3/9 19:59, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote: > > Hi Jia-Ju, > > > > Thank you for the patch! > > > >> From: Jia-Ju Bai, Sent: Sunday, March 7, 2021 6:01 PM > >> > >> When __usbhsf_pkt_get() returns NULL to pkt, no error return code of > >> usbhsf_pkt_handler() is assigned. > > Yes. Also I realized that no error return code of usbhsf_pkt_handler() > > was assigned if the type value was unexpected value. So, I'm thinking > > initial value of ret should be -EINVAL instead of 0. > > This is okay to me. > Need I write a new patch for this? Thank you for your reply. I can write such a new patch with your Reported-by for this as minor refactoring of the usbhsf_pkt_handler(). May I write such a patch? Best regards, Yoshihiro Shimoda
