On Tue, Feb 2, 2021 at 4:01 PM Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > On Tue, Feb 02, 2021 at 03:44:05PM +0100, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > +/** > > > + * device_create_managed_software_node - Create a software node for a device > > > + * @dev: The device the software node is assigned to. > > > + * @properties: Device properties for the software node. > > > + * @parent: Parent of the software node. > > > + * > > > + * Creates a software node as a managed resource for @dev, which means the > > > + * lifetime of the newly created software node is tied to the lifetime of @dev. > > > + * Software nodes created with this function should not be reused or shared > > > + * because of that. The function takes a deep copy of @properties for the > > > + * software node. > > > + * > > > + * Since the new software node is assigned directly to @dev, and since it should > > > + * not be shared, it is not returned to the caller. The function returns 0 on > > > + * success, and errno in case of an error. > > > + */ > > > +int device_create_managed_software_node(struct device *dev, > > > + const struct property_entry *properties, > > > + const struct software_node *parent) > > > +{ > > > + struct fwnode_handle *p = software_node_fwnode(parent); > > > + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode; > > > + > > > + if (parent && !p) > > > + return -EINVAL; > > > + > > > + fwnode = fwnode_create_software_node(properties, p); > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > To answer your question below: here. > > > > + if (IS_ERR(fwnode)) > > > + return PTR_ERR(fwnode); > > > + > > > + to_swnode(fwnode)->managed = true; > > > + set_secondary_fwnode(dev, fwnode); > > > + > > > + return 0; > > > +} > > > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(device_create_managed_software_node); > > > + > > > int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action) > > > { > > > struct swnode *swnode; > > > @@ -1073,6 +1111,11 @@ int software_node_notify(struct device *dev, unsigned long action) > > > sysfs_remove_link(&swnode->kobj, dev_name(dev)); > > > sysfs_remove_link(&dev->kobj, "software_node"); > > > kobject_put(&swnode->kobj); > > > + > > > + if (swnode->managed) { > > > + set_secondary_fwnode(dev, NULL); > > > + kobject_put(&swnode->kobj); > > > > Where does the corresponding kobject_get() get called? > > So in function fwnode_create_software_node() we use > kobject_init_and_add(). OK It looks like there is a use case that cannot be addressed by using device_add_properties() and that's why you need this new function. Can you describe that use case, please, and explain what the problem with using device_add_properties() in it is?