Den 21.01.2021 11.20, skrev Simon Ser: > On Thursday, January 21st, 2021 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Well, I'd strongly ask to not call it "generic", because it isn't. We >> have other USB drivers and anyone can make a USB display with these >> protocols as well. That doesn't make them generic. A USB-standardized >> protocol would be generic. Maybe call it custom, or home-made. I agree that Generic probably isn't the best term to use here. Naming stuff is hard. Maybe: Open USB Display Protocol - oudp? > > Maybe rename it to "GUD USB Display driver"? :P > Oh that's a recursive acronym :-) That would save me all the work of renaming. I think I'll go with that, thanks. Noralf.
