On Thursday, January 21st, 2021 at 10:59 AM, Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Well, I'd strongly ask to not call it "generic", because it isn't. We > have other USB drivers and anyone can make a USB display with these > protocols as well. That doesn't make them generic. A USB-standardized > protocol would be generic. Maybe call it custom, or home-made. Maybe rename it to "GUD USB Display driver"? :P
