On Wed, 2021-01-20 at 16:19 +0100, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > If you can get the "owners" of these repos to agree, than sure. Excellent, please invite these GitHub users to the linux-usb admin list, so that they can move the projects if they want to. Matt Porter: @ohporter (for libusbg) Krzysztof Opasiak: @kopasiak (for libusbgx, gt) Karol Lewandowski: @lmctl (for gadgetd) Andrzej Pietrasiewicz: @andrzejtp (for cmtp-responder) If you would like to invite me too, I'm @pabs3 on GitHub. I expect some other folks on linux-usb might like to join too. > But we should work out the libusbg and libusbx issue, which is really > the "latest" one? libusbgx is a fork of libusbg and is more recently updated. I'd suggest to also move libusbg and archive it (make it read-only). > If you are moving the repos, why do you care about the issue and pull > request database anymore? Will they just not end up going away? When moving projects (as opposed to forking them), GitHub moves everything along with the git repo, including issues and pull requests. -- bye, pabs https://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
