Re: wrong order of events in usb serial suspension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Montag, 20. Juli 2009 23:31:03 schrieb Alan Stern:
> On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > it seems to me that usb_serial_suspend() is buggy. If a subdriver
> > vetos a suspension we already have killed all URBs, which we cannot
> > undo in the generic layer because we don't know what damage we have
> > done. Comments?
>
> Your point is well taken.  Do any of the subdrivers depend on the URBs
> being killed before their suspend method gets called?

As far as I can tell, no.

	Regards
		Oliver

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux