Re: wrong order of events in usb serial suspension

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 20 Jul 2009, Oliver Neukum wrote:

> Hi,
> 
> it seems to me that usb_serial_suspend() is buggy. If a subdriver
> vetos a suspension we already have killed all URBs, which we cannot
> undo in the generic layer because we don't know what damage we have
> done. Comments?

Your point is well taken.  Do any of the subdrivers depend on the URBs
being killed before their suspend method gets called?

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux