Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 16:28 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold: > On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > > Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 15:59 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold: > > > For interfaces that lack a union descriptor, probe for a > > > "combined-interface" before falling back to the call-management > > > descriptor instead of the other way round. > > > > Hi, Hi, > > > > the more I look at this the more it seems to me like the > > device that has the quirk does NOT have a collapsed interface > > but two interfaces and just a lack of a union descriptor. > > But then why name the quirk NO_DATA_INTERFACE if it has a data In hindsight that seems not the best name. > interface? By hardcoding the data-interface number to be the one and > only interface, you'd end up probing for a "combined" interface also > with a broken call-management descriptor. Well, by the changelog assuming a combined interface caused an oops. Thence I am forced to conclude that the davices _has_ a separate data interface, but no union descriptor. > Side note: I really think we should start mandating lsusb output to go > along with any patch for quirky devices. Good idea. Convince Greg. Regards Oliver
