On Mon, Sep 21, 2020 at 04:16:56PM +0200, Oliver Neukum wrote: > Am Montag, den 21.09.2020, 15:59 +0200 schrieb Johan Hovold: > > For interfaces that lack a union descriptor, probe for a > > "combined-interface" before falling back to the call-management > > descriptor instead of the other way round. > > Hi, > > the more I look at this the more it seems to me like the > device that has the quirk does NOT have a collapsed interface > but two interfaces and just a lack of a union descriptor. But then why name the quirk NO_DATA_INTERFACE if it has a data interface? By hardcoding the data-interface number to be the one and only interface, you'd end up probing for a "combined" interface also with a broken call-management descriptor. Side note: I really think we should start mandating lsusb output to go along with any patch for quirky devices. > I am taking the original author into CC (hoping it still workd) > Johan, would just taking the first three patches of the series work for > now? Of course, no problem holding back the last one for a bit. Johan
