On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 03:00:51PM +0200, javier Martin wrote: > 2009/7/15 Daniel Mack <daniel@xxxxxxxx>: > > On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 02:45:02PM +0200, javier Martin wrote: > >> The problem was an issue with chip select line, which is connected to > >> a GPIO in my board. > >> I was not using GPIO interface properly. > >> > >> Now it has been solved. So, your patches also work on i.mx27. > >> > >> I will send a patch with the changes needed in > >> "/arch/arm/mach-mx2/devices.c" and > >> "/arch/arm/mach-mx2/clock_imx27.c" to add platform devices and > >> resources in i.mx27. > > > > Ok, fine. > > > >> Who should I send this patch to, linux-usb or linux-arm-kernel mantainer? > > > > Send them to Sasche and the arm-linux mailing list. > > And base them on top of my patch stack, please. I hope Sascha will > > What do you mean when you say that I must base my patch in the top of your > patch stack? In case your patch touches the same files like my patches do, yours should cleanly apply _after_ mine. But I guess that's already correct. Just wanted to make sure. Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
