On Wed, 8 Jul 2009, Yang Fei-AFY095 wrote: > Your patch does fix the issue. But if udev->do_remote_wakeup had been > set, we would not have this issue, right? Right. > What's the purpose of do_remote_wakeup? It indicates that when the device was suspended, remote wakeup was enabled. > Would it be better just set this > variable somewhere? I'm afraid completely replacing the if - else > statement would cause some other issue, just guessing, please advise. I don't think replacing the "if" statement will cause other problems. The worst that will happen is very rarely a suspended device will be resumed unnecessarily. That won't matter, because the kernel will re-suspend the device afterward. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
