Hi Andy,
Thank you very much for prompt review comments...
On 11/6/2020 4:57 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 04:36:29PM +0800, Ramuthevar, Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
On 11/6/2020 4:12 pm, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 10:12:46AM +0800, Ramuthevar,Vadivel MuruganX wrote:
From: Ramuthevar Vadivel Murugan <vadivel.muruganx.ramuthevar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
...
+ ret = readl_poll_timeout(ctrl1, val, val & SRAM_INIT_DONE,
+ 10, 10 * 1000);
exceeds more than 80 characters, so checkpatch throws warnings, to avoid
that move to next line.
On one line easier to read.
It's 82 characters. It's fine.
Noted.
+ if (ret) {
+ dev_err(ta->phy.dev, "SRAM init failed, 0x%x\n", val);
+ return ret;
+ }
...
+ int ret = 0;
Assignment is redundant.
so you mean , should be declared as
int ret;
right?
Right.
okay, Thanks!
...
+ dev_info(ta->phy.dev, "connected%s\n",
+ flipped ? " flipped" : "");
One line.
exceeds more than 80 characters, so checkpatch throw warnings, to avoid that
moved to next line.
It's fine to have on one line.
And by the way, try new checkpatch.
Sure , will try and fix it.
Regards
Vadivel
