On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 3:29 PM Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 5/11/20 1:44 PM, Andy Shevchenko wrote: ... > > I would rather disable them and issue a firmware bug. > > Vendors, including us, should do something sane about this. > > I have to partially disagree here. I agree that for future hardware > versions the firmware team of those devices should offer a saner > interface. But for the current hardware gen I guess we are stuck > with this and having a DMI table for popular models (well any model > a Linux user is willing to submit a quirk for) is better then simply > not having things working under Linux. > > I do wonder what Windows does here though. Perhaps the INT3513 device > has some ACPI methods to query for more info, like how many Type-C > controllers there actually are? I think they do silly things there in usual obscure MS way, i.e. hardcoding everything in the driver per platform. That's why I'm really disappointed how things are going on. -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko
