On Tuesday 23 June 2009, you wrote: > On Tue, 23 Jun 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > On Friday 19 June 2009, Frans Pop wrote: > > > On Friday 19 June 2009, Alan Stern wrote: > > > > On second thought, maybe it is better for sysfs to continue > > > > exporting the raw value in hex. ?The script can do all the > > > > necessary processing. > > > > > > Hmm. What about the discrepancy that remains between > > > bMaxPacketSize0 and ep_*/wMaxPacketSize in that case? > > > > Alan? > > Oh, sorry -- I lost your earlier message. > > There is no problem. What you thought was a discrepancy really wasn't. > Run your new script and you'll see. It only _looked_ like a > discrepancy because you were comparing a decimal value to a hex value. Yes of course, but what I mean is that this decision means that still bMaxPacketSize0 will be binary while wMaxPacketSize is hex in sysfs. Having two variables that essentially contain the same info in a differing format seems illogical to me. It also means we cannot display the multiplier for ep00 (we dropped its E: line after all), while we do display it for the other end points. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
