Marcel Holtmann schrieb:
Hi Kai,
Add modem portion of USB device labeled:
Model iCON 210, Qualcomm 3G HSDPA, designed in EU by Option
Signed-off-by: Kai Engert<kaie@xxxxxxx>
---
Resending to the correct mailing list (originally went to linux-kernel)
Device starts in usb-storage mode (1e0e:f000) and requires the use of a tool like usb_modeswitch to switch it to modem mode (1e0e:9000).
I'm not subscribed to the mailing list, please cc me on replies, thanks.
Regards, Kai
--- linux-2.6.30/drivers/usb/serial/option.c.preicon210 2009-06-12 08:11:37.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.30/drivers/usb/serial/option.c 2009-06-12 08:11:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -93,6 +93,9 @@
#define OPTION_PRODUCT_ETNA_KOI_MODEM 0x7100
#define OPTION_PRODUCT_GTM380_MODEM 0x7201
+#define QUALCOMM_OPTION_VENDOR_ID 0x1e0e
+#define QUALCOMM_OPTION_PRODUCT_ICON_210 0x9000
what non-sense is this. Either the vendor is Qualcomm or it is Option,
but not both.
I don't know the true vendor name. Both names are printed on the device:
"Qualcomm ... designed by Option"
I concluded it's a collaboration. I couldn't find USB vendor ID 0x1E0E
anywhere else.
If you want me to pick one, I'd pick QUALCOMM.
If I don't hear objections, I'll change it and send a new patch.
most likely it is neither of them. Qualcomm builds the UMTS chip that
Option uses and then these devices get branded.
What does lsusb -v or /proc/bus/usb/devices say about the vendor string.
I prefer we put a proper vendor in there and this USB vendor ids are
assigned it would be easy to find out who it belongs to.
0x1e0e (or dec. 7694) is not in the vendor list on
http://www.usb.org/developers/tools/comp_dump
Josua Dietze
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
