On Thu, 13 Jun 2019, Lee Jones wrote: > On Wed, 12 Jun 2019, Wolfram Sang wrote: > > > > > > There are no cross-subsystem build dependencies on any of these > > > patches. The only reason they are bundled together in the same > > > patch-set is for cross-subsystem visibility and understanding. > > > > > > There is wide interest in these devices. > > > > I see. That would have been a great cover-letter, Lee ;) Thanks for the > > heads up! > > :) > > > > > Also, the current maintainer entry for this driver looks like: > > > > > > > > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-qcom-geni.c: > > > > Andy Gross <agross@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT) > > > > David Brown <david.brown@xxxxxxxxxx> (maintainer:ARM/QUALCOMM SUPPORT) > > > > Alok Chauhan <alokc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> (supporter:QUALCOMM GENERIC INTERFACE I2C DRIVER) > > > > > > > > I didn't hear from those people yet, would be great to have their acks. > > > > > > I will see if I can rouse them from their slumber. > > > > Please do. If they are not to reach, we probably need to update the > > entry... > > I contacted both of them. > > Andy doesn't touch anything that isn't QUP based (8994 and older). > > David doesn't deal with MSM platforms if Andy is available. > > So I guess the decision is yours. Seeing at this patch is pretty > trivial and has our ACPI expert's Ack, the decision shouldn't be a > difficult one. BTW, v4 has collected Acks and a cover-letter. :) -- Lee Jones [李琼斯] Linaro Services Technical Lead Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
