On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 02:42:26PM -0800, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 2:29 PM Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Hi Marcel, > > > > On Sat, Jan 19, 2019 at 11:51 AM Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > Hi Rajat, > > > > > > > In preparation for handling embedded USB devices let's split > > > > usb_acpi_find_companion() into usb_acpi_find_companion_for_device() and > > > > usb_acpi_find_companion_for_port(). > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain <rajatja@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Tested-by: Sukumar Ghorai <sukumar.ghorai@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > --- > > > > v4: Add Acked-by and Tested-by in signatures. > > > > v3: same as v1 > > > > v2: same as v1 > > > > > > > > drivers/usb/core/usb-acpi.c | 133 +++++++++++++++++++----------------- > > > > 1 file changed, 72 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-) > > > > > > what is the plan here? I take this via bluetooth-next tree? > > > > Yes, I'd think that would be the best plan. Dmitry / Greg - do you > > have any objections / suggestions? > > That's up to Greg, but since he'd acked the patches I'd assume he's OK > with taking it through bluetooth. As an option Marcel could cut an > immutable branch off 4.20 with the first 2 patches so that he and Greg > can both pull it into their main branches and then git will do the > right thing when Linus pulls from them. Lee uses quite a bit of them > in MFD and other maintainers are known to occasionally make them for > work that needs to be shared between trees. I don't need to take these, they can all go through one tree, which is why I gave my ack to the patch. thanks, greg k-h
