Hi, Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > We have already returned EAGAIN for bus-expiry, and it's designed to > start with a future Frame number and start the transfer again. So we > should not remove the request for that case. > > Signed-off-by: Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Do we need a Fixes tag here? How about Cc stable? Can you share tracepoints exposing the problem? thanks -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
