Viral Mehta wrote:
+
/*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
/*
@@ -426,7 +488,9 @@ static int rh_call_control (struct usb_hcd *hcd,
struct urb *urb)
case DeviceRequest | USB_REQ_GET_DESCRIPTOR:
switch (wValue & 0xff00) {
case USB_DT_DEVICE << 8:
- if (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_USB2)
+ if (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_USB3)
+ bufp = usb3_rh_dev_descriptor;
+ else if (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_USB2)
bufp = usb2_rh_dev_descriptor;
else if (hcd->driver->flags & HCD_USB11)
bufp = usb11_rh_dev_descriptor;
I think better to replace "if ... else if... else" with switch case as
you did in patch [06/23]
You think its not a good idea ? or you want me to drop a patch to do this ?
--
Thanks,
Viral Mehta, Embedded Software Engineer, www.einfochips.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
