RE: [PATCH] usb: chipidea: imx: unify over-current polarity handling

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Uwe Kleine-König [mailto:u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, November 30, 2018 3:35 PM
> 
> Hello Fabio,
> 
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 07:16:39PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> > [Adding Matt]
> >
> > On Fri, Nov 30, 2018 at 6:53 PM Uwe Kleine-König
> > <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > > The status quo is:
> > >  - on i.MX25 the overcurrent polarity is always explicitly configured as
> > >    active high which matches the reset default.
> > >  - on i.MX6 and i.MX7 the overcurrent polarity is active high after
> > >    reset. usbmisc_imx6q_init() and usbmisc_imx7d_init() keep the current
> > >    state (probably as setup by the bootloader or still the reset
> > >    default) unless the polarity is explicitly configured as active high
> > >    which then is configured. (So if the pin is active low and the
> > >    bootloader didn't set this up the configuration is wrong.)
> > >
> > > To improve the situation always configure the reset default value unless
> > > the device tree configures the polarity (and then use this one).
> > >
> > > Note that as the reset default is active high on all platforms there is
> > > no need to check for the presence of "over-current-active-high". In the
> > > absence of "over-current-active-low" it doesn't matter if active high is
> > > configured because that's the default or because it is configured
> > > explicitly.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >
> > It seems that Matt is also interested in adding the
> > 'over-current-active-low' property:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10701311/
> 
> Looking at Matt's patch I noticed that I applied my patch on an old
> kernel version (4.14) :-|
> 
> But I think Matt's patch is broken because in usbmisc_imx6q_init() in
> the last else branch MX6_BM_OVER_CUR_POLARITY isn't cleared. Other
> than
> that they don't look that different semantically.
> 
> I will respin my patch on Monday.
> 

Uwe,

You are correct that I missed the clearing of MX6_BM_OVER_CUR_POLARITY.

Also I don't see any reason why that last else that should clear MX6_BM_OVER_CUR_POLARITY and MX6_BM_OVER_CUR_DIS shouldn't also be in the usbmisc_imx7d_init function too.

I just resubmitted my patch based on 4.20-rc4 with the mentioned changes.

Matt Starr



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux