Hi, Roger Quadros <rogerq@xxxxxx> writes: >>> Also can we have some consistency in usage of '-' vs '_'? >> Right.. I agree. I've been using '-' as it is the preferred syntax as >> most of the properties, but some old properties use '_'. Do you have any >> suggestion? > > I'd keep it consistent to "snps,usb3_lpm_capable" so we avoid mistakes > when writing the DT. > Felipe? _ are not really accepted in DT, except for legacy properties. What we can do is rename usb3_lpm_capable to usb3-lpm-capable and change code to try with _ if - fails. Then we can introduce the new property using - -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
