On 21.05.2018 19:42, Adam Wallis wrote:
On 5/21/2018 9:53 AM, Mathias Nyman wrote:
On 21.05.2018 15:56, Adam Wallis wrote:
Not sure if if there's any benefit in allocating the scratchpad structures from
a closer node, or any harm? xhci driver doesn't really access scratchpad that
frequently.
I don't see how it would hurt and I think it's easier to keep all of the
allocations consistent...however, let me know if you want those backed out.
I guess they don't do any harm
The port related structures are changing completely, so xhci->usb2_ports
xhci->usb3_ports
and other related are going away. Just sent a series for that. So some rebasing
is needed.
Would it be easier to just rebase on top of your for-usb-next branch in that
case? I had been only testing on top of 4.17rc5.
Let me know what you think is best/easiest for you.
Rebasing on top of my for-usb-next would be easiest for me
Thanks
Mathias
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
