On 5/21/2018 9:53 AM, Mathias Nyman wrote: > On 21.05.2018 15:56, Adam Wallis wrote: > Not sure if if there's any benefit in allocating the scratchpad structures from > a closer node, or any harm? xhci driver doesn't really access scratchpad that > frequently. I don't see how it would hurt and I think it's easier to keep all of the allocations consistent...however, let me know if you want those backed out. > The port related structures are changing completely, so xhci->usb2_ports > xhci->usb3_ports > and other related are going away. Just sent a series for that. So some rebasing > is needed. Would it be easier to just rebase on top of your for-usb-next branch in that case? I had been only testing on top of 4.17rc5. Let me know what you think is best/easiest for you. -- Adam Wallis Qualcomm Datacenter Technologies as an affiliate of Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. Qualcomm Technologies, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum, a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
