On Thu, 16 Apr 2009, David Brownell wrote: > On Thursday 16 April 2009, Dan Streetman wrote: > > If you don't mind, I'd like to summarize, as I think we only really > > disagree on 2 points: > > > > 1. Can more than 188 bytes worth of SSPLTs be issued in a single uframe? > > 2. Can an Isoc transfer that is larger than 188 bytes be started in a > > uframe that is not empty? > > > What does all this discussion mean for the $SUBJECT patch? > Merge, with improved comment? As "temporary"? > Or reject, in favor of more substantive updates? The patch does fix a bug in the current code, so it should be merged. IMO the whole area could stand some improvement, but writing it will be non-trivial. For now, let's just get this fix in. Alan Stern -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
