On Thursday 16 April 2009, Dan Streetman wrote: > If you don't mind, I'd like to summarize, as I think we only really > disagree on 2 points: > > 1. Can more than 188 bytes worth of SSPLTs be issued in a single uframe? > 2. Can an Isoc transfer that is larger than 188 bytes be started in a > uframe that is not empty? What does all this discussion mean for the $SUBJECT patch? Merge, with improved comment? As "temporary"? Or reject, in favor of more substantive updates? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
