On Thu, Apr 09, 2009 at 08:32:23PM +0400, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> David Brownell wrote:
>
> > More patches from Sergei. Patch comments this time
> > around were pretty much OK -- succinct, mostly just
> > needing shorter lines (as long ones getting mangled
> > by mailers and on GIT entry).
> >
> > Two count as bugfixes to peripheral IRQ handling:
> >
> > - musb_gadget: fix unhandled endpoint 0 IRQs
> > - musb_gadget: suppress "parasitic" TX interrupts with CPPI
> >
> > The rest are more along the lines of cleanup, which
> > in one case prepares to support another SoC:
> >
> > - musb_host: refactor musb_save_toggle() (take 2)
> > - musb_host: factor out musb_ep_{get|set}_qh()
> > - musb_host: simplify check for active URB
> > - musb_host: streamline musb_cleanup_urb() calls
> > - musb_host: refactor URB giveback
> > - musb: split out CPPI interrupt handler
>
> > Sanity tested on both OMAP3 and DaVinci.
>
> Greg, I really did hope that these will get into 2.6.30-rc1 as they were
> posted in a plenty of time for that. Is there still a chance that they can
> get into 2.6.30?
Very doubtful, they need to be bugfix only. Refactoring and
streamlining patches are not allowed after -rc1. Your patches were not
in linux-next before 2.6.29 came out, so it missed the initial merge
window.
I'll consider the "fix" patch, I'll have to see how it fits with the
other musb "fix" patches that are in my queue.
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
