Re: [RFC] Specify/support PROTO_NONE for CDC ACM serial dongles

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 12:26 PM, David Brownell <david-b@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thursday 02 April 2009, Russ Dill wrote:
>> so why not use USB_CDC_PROTO_NONE? It still works with the usbser.sys
>> windows driver. udev rules could later be written to not consider USB
>> ACM devices that have PROTO_NONE as modems.
>
> I don't entirely recall why it uses USB_CDC_ACM_PROTO_AT_V25TER;
> ISTR that's how the original serial gadget code worked (which I
> didn't write).
>
> It was probably because of some client code -- maybe cdc-acm.c
> even -- which required it.  (Which version of usbser.sys was
> OK with it?  XP/SP2 and newer?)

Yes, I tested on XP/SP3.

> Never made much sense to me.  I'd call the cdc-acm fix obvious,
> and suggest it get into the -stable kernels.
>
> Unfortunately changing the serial gadget code would obviously
> break interop with current Linux hosts ... so what I'd do is
> provide some kind of feature-removal listing for that, maybe
> a couple years from now, so the cdc-acm host side driver fix
> would be relatively widely deployed before that gets changed.

If there is a better option, I'm all for it. I think that the Network
Manager developers are willing to exclude vendor Netchip.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux