Re: [PATCH] hso: add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 1 Apr 2009, Jan Dumon wrote:

> From: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> Add Vendor/Product ID's for new devices.
> Removed duplicate product ID 0x7361.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jan Dumon <j.dumon@xxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
> diff --git a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> index fe98aca..d47c508 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/usb/hso.c
> @@ -462,9 +462,16 @@ static const struct usb_device_id hso_ids[] = {
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7701)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7801)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7901)},
> -	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x7361)},
> -	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd057)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x8200)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0x8201)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd035)},
>  	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd055)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd155)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd255)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd057)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd157)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd257)},
> +	{USB_DEVICE(0x0af0, 0xd357)},
>  	{}
>  };
>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(usb, hso_ids);

Is this list supposed to be kept in numerical order?  The entries for
0xd057 and 0xd157 are in the wrong place.

Alan Stern

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html

[Index of Archives]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Input]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Old Linux USB Devel Archive]

  Powered by Linux