Hi Manu,
thank you for reviewing this!
On Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 7:42 AM, Manu Gautam <mgautam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On 10/24/2017 3:27 AM, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
>> This integrates the PHY roothub wrapper into the core hcd
>> infrastructure. Multiple PHYs which are part of the roothub devicetree
>> node (which is a sub-node of the sysdev's node) are now managed
>> (= powered on/off when needed), by the new usb_phy_roothub code.
>>
>> One example where this is required is the Amlogic GXL and GXM SoCs:
>> They are using a dwc3 USB controller with up to three ports enabled on
>> the internal roothub. Using only the top-level "phy" properties does not
>> work here since one can only specify one "usb2-phy" and one "usb3-phy",
>> while actually at least two "usb2-phy" have to be specified.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Tested-by: Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> drivers/usb/core/hcd.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> include/linux/usb/hcd.h | 1 +
>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> index 67aa3d039b9b..6ee97222cdad 100644
>> --- a/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/usb/core/hcd.c
>> @@ -50,6 +50,7 @@
>> #include <linux/usb/otg.h>
>>
>> #include "usb.h"
>> +#include "phy.h"
>>
>>
>> /*-------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>> @@ -2271,6 +2272,8 @@ int hcd_bus_suspend(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>> usb_set_device_state(rhdev, USB_STATE_SUSPENDED);
>> hcd->state = HC_STATE_SUSPENDED;
>>
>> + usb_phy_roothub_power_off(hcd->phy_roothub);
>> +
>
> For system-suspend it should be ok.
> But, in case of runtime/auto suspend, I think PHYs shouldn't be powered off.
> Should we have check for that like-
>
> if (!PMSG_IS_AUTO(msg))
> usb_phy_roothub_power_off()
>
> Similar check in hcd_bus_resume?
disclaimer: I must admit that I am not very familiar with the PM code
and even worse: the platform I'm developing with does not have suspend support
can I take your suggestion and include it in the next version of this
series or should we wait for feedback from another developer on this
topic?
>
>> /* Did we race with a root-hub wakeup event? */
>> if (rhdev->do_remote_wakeup) {
>> char buffer[6];
>> @@ -2307,6 +2310,11 @@ int hcd_bus_resume(struct usb_device *rhdev, pm_message_t msg)
>> dev_dbg(&rhdev->dev, "skipped %s of dead bus\n", "resume");
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +
>> + status = usb_phy_roothub_power_on(hcd->phy_roothub);
>> + if (status)
>> + return status;
>> +
>
> --
> The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum,
> a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
>
Regards
Martin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
