On 10/12/2017 01:53 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote:
Hi,
Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
I thought that patches 1 and 2, as they are "driver" patches, had to be
applied on USB tree (so Felipe's one), and the others (3 to 7) had to be
applied on STM32-DT tree (Alex's one). Did I miss something?
patch 1 is documentation, right? Without the documentation patch,
checkpatch will cringe :-) So either way works.
If you insist, I can take 1-2 through my tree. No worries.
I don't want to insist :) but for me it is better (and more safe) if you
take patch 1&2 in your tree, and will take others in mine.
Okay, I'll apply 1&2
they are now in my testing/next and next branches.
Thanks Felipe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-usb" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
