Hi, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@xxxxxx> writes: > Hi Felip > > On 10/11/2017 12:04 PM, Felipe Balbi wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Amelie Delaunay <amelie.delaunay@xxxxxx> writes: >>> The STM32F7 MCU family embeds two DWC2 USB OTG cores. One core is USB >>> OTG FS and the other is USB OTG HS. The USB FS core only works with its >>> internal phy whilst the USB HS core can work in HS with external ULPI phy >>> or in FS/LS with the on-chip FS phy. >>> >>> Amelie Delaunay (7): >>> dt-bindings: usb: Document the STM32F7 DWC2 USB OTG HS core binding >>> usb: dwc2: add support for STM32F7 USB OTG HS >>> ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU >> >> I have applied these three patches. Should I take the rest? They seems >> like they could go upstream through the ARM maintainers. >> > > I will take other DT patches in my PR. > > Concerning "ARM: dts: stm32: Add USB HS support for STM32F746 MCU" patch > I prefer also to take it. This patch adds some pinctrl groups but stm32 > pinctrl bindings will change in my next PR (we will use a macro to > define pins instead of using defined values). So if you push the DT > patch through your pull request there will be a merge issue. > It is possible that I take also this one ? In that case, it's best if you take them all :-) Here's my Ack: Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <felipe.balbi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> I'll drop them from my tree now -- balbi
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
